ALFA-K: Local adaptive mapping of karyotype fitness landscapes

1. Bakhoum, S. F. & Cantley, L. C. The multifaceted role of chromosomal instability in cancer and its microenvironment. Cell 174, 1347–1360 (2018).

   Google Scholar 

2. Santaguida, S. & Amon, A. Short- and long-term effects of chromosome mis-segregation and aneuploidy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 473–485 (2015).

   Google Scholar 

3. Sansregret, L., Vanhaesebroeck, B. & Swanton, C. Determinants and clinical implications of chromosomal instability in cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 15, 139–150 (2018).

   Google Scholar 

4. Ben-David, U. & Amon, A. Context is everything: aneuploidy in cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 44–62 (2020).

   Google Scholar 

5. Pavelka, N. et al. Aneuploidy confers quantitative proteome changes and phenotypic variation in budding yeast. Nature 468, 321–325 (2010).

   Google Scholar 

6. Torres, E. M. et al. Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science 317, 916–924 (2007).

   Google Scholar 

7. Chen, G., Rubinstein, B. & Li, R. Whole chromosome aneuploidy: big mutations drive adaptation by phenotypic leap. Bioessays 34, 893–900 (2012).

   Google Scholar 

8. Shih, J. et al. Cancer aneuploidies are shaped primarily by effects on tumour fitness. Nature 619, 793–800 (2023).

   Google Scholar 

9. Davoli, T. et al. Cumulative haploinsufficiency and triplosensitivity drive aneuploidy patterns and shape the cancer genome. Cell 155, 948–962 (2013).

   Google Scholar 

10. Torres, E. M., Williams, B. R. & Amon, A. Aneuploidy: cells losing their balance. Genetics 179, 737–746 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

11. Tang, Y.-C. & Amon, A. Gene copy-number alterations: a cost-benefit analysis. Cell 152, 394–405 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

12. ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes. Nature 578, 82–93 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

13. Nguyen, B. et al. Genomic characterization of metastatic patterns from prospective clinical sequencing of 25,000 patients. Cell 185, 563–575.e11 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

14. Drews, R. M. et al. A pan-cancer compendium of chromosomal instability. Nature 606, 976–983 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

15. Shukla, A. et al. Chromosome arm aneuploidies shape tumour evolution and drug response. Nat. Commun. 11, 449 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

16. Karlsson, K. et al. Deterministic evolution and stringent selection during preneoplasia. Nature 618, 383–393 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

17. Baslan, T. et al. Ordered and deterministic cancer genome evolution after p53 loss. Nature 608, 795–802 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

18. Gusev, Y., Kagansky, V. & Dooley, W. C. A stochastic model of chromosome segregation errors with reference to cancer cells. Math. Comput. Model. 32, 97–111 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

19. Gusev, Y., Kagansky, V. & Dooley, W. C. Long-term dynamics of chromosomal instability in cancer: a transition probability model. Math. Comput. Model. 33, 1253–1273 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

20. Elizalde, S., Laughney, A. M. & Bakhoum, S. F. A Markov chain for numerical chromosomal instability in clonally expanding populations. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006447 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

21. Laughney, A. M., Elizalde, S., Genovese, G. & Bakhoum, S. F. Dynamics of tumor heterogeneity derived from clonal karyotypic evolution. Cell Rep. 12, 809–820 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

22. Lynch, A. R., Arp, N. L., Zhou, A. S., Weaver, B. A. & Burkard, M. E. Quantifying chromosomal instability from intratumoral karyotype diversity using agent-based modeling and Bayesian inference. Elife 11, e69799 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

23. Salehi, S. et al. Clonal fitness inferred from time-series modelling of single-cell cancer genomes. Nature 595, 585–590 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

24. Nowak, M. A. Exploring the Equations of Life. (Harvard Univ. Press: Cambridge, MA, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

25. Kimmel, G. J. et al. Intra-tumor heterogeneity, turnover rate and karyotype space shape susceptibility to missegregation-induced extinction. PLoS Comput. Biol. 19, e1010815 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

26. Watson, E. V. et al. Chromosome evolution screens recapitulate tissue-specific tumor aneuploidy patterns. Nat. Genet. 56, 900–912 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

27. Vargas-Rondón, N., Villegas, V. E. & Rondón-Lagos, M. The role of chromosomal instability in cancer and therapeutic responses. Cancers 10, 4 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

28. Gatenby, R. A., Silva, A. S., Gillies, R. J. & Frieden, B. R. Adaptive therapy. Cancer Res. 69, 4894–4903 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

29. Gemble, S. et al. Genetic instability from a single S phase after whole-genome duplication. Nature 604, 146–151 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

30. Bakhoum, S. F. et al. Chromosomal instability drives metastasis through a cytosolic DNA response. Nature 553, 467–472 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

31. Thompson, S. L. & Compton, D. A. Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 180, 665–672 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

32. Shi, Q. & King, R. W. Chromosome nondisjunction yields tetraploid rather than aneuploid cells in human cell lines. Nature 437, 1038–1042 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

33. Fabre, M. A. et al. The longitudinal dynamics and natural history of clonal haematopoiesis. Nature 606, 335–342 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

34. Oktriani, R. et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies genes involved in metastasis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancers 16, 3684 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

35. Jain, I. H. et al. Genetic screen for cell fitness in high or low oxygen highlights mitochondrial and lipid metabolism. Cell 181, 716–727.e11 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

36. Beck, R. J. Processed data supporting ALFA-K. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15809074 (2025).

37. Beck, R. J. ALFA-K Manuscript Reproducibility Code. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17753550 (2025).

38. Beck, R. J. alfakR R Package. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17753535 (2025).

Download references